I think all ens should be distributed to all snt domain name registrants. The distribution method is as follows: 1. According to the registered domain name, regardless of whether they are in the same account; 2. Weight distribution according to the length of registration time. Those who can register snt domain names are basically staunch supporters of snt.On the one hand, the airdrop ens is to reward people who have been supporting and participating in snt domain name registration, on the other hand, it is also to attract more people to participate in snt.
3 Likes
I donāt think that an account needs more than one username, if someone done that, was probably to squatting popular names, and I wouldnāt want to incentivize this behavior. There is no problem in registering as many usernames you want, but having more then one is not very useful for the community.
4 Likes
what is my jobļ¼how can i doļ¼
The core contributors that created the feature were doing work that they were paid a salary and SNT bonus for - so whilst they did a great job, Iād argue that 100% should go to registered accounts.
5 Likes
Hi @petty any updates about the redistribution of ENS to the community ?
4 Likes
Hi team, 3 weeks from now, can we have some updates about your decision guys ? @admins
3 Likes
What is the Status of voting on a proposal? Is a proposal being written? When will a vote be scheduled on the proposal? It would be wise if there were some follow up on this soon.
It seems as though there is a reasonable enough amount of consensus that ENS should be distributed to holders of ENS Usernames.
I hope to have a proposal of this process written and up for SNT vote within a week. Why a vote? Because Iām not in charge of this, no one hired by Status is. The community is.
As for timing, Iām personally in the middle of moving homes and quite busy, so my apologies for slowness. That being said, ENS is still claimable in the contract so it isnāt like weāre dragging our feet too bad.
4 Likes
Thank you for your response Petty. Good luck with the move. Sorry for my impatience.
UPDATE: a draft of the proposal has been created. Iām circulating it internally to check for errors and edge cases I missed. Weāll get it up and ready to vote on as soon as it passes those checks.
8 Likes
Vote will be on vote.status.im, correct?
hi petty some updates to share ?
I just want to ask why the voting plan has not been released since the consultation has been finalized? Should something so simple have to be delayed for so long? Why is no one responsible? Do I need to urge you to move?
I just want to ask why the voting plan has not been released since the consultation has been finalized? Should something so simple have to be delayed for so long? Why is no one responsible? Do I need to urge you to move?
@cyy_ok I would say that this is the way the STATUS team does thingsā¦ Such result is very STATUS , when STATUS say the word soon , it means months , u need to get used to itā¦ lol
1 Like
well kind of shamefull for something so simple to do ā¦
1 Like
At this point itās stealing. It does not take long to see who the rightful owners are of ENS and distribute accordingly. The SNT community (however few) that voted on this made it clear that this is what they wanted. For some reason it has yet to happen (greed and theft). I donāt think we (Status Community) will see OUR ENS. If the Status team had ANY INTEGRITY then they would have distributed the ENS as voted on. looks like they are going to take the $ and run sad
1 Like
Pls @petty make him wrong, cant we trust status team ?
How about an update on the current state of the ENS token discussion. Any progress on the draft proposal? Also, what are the wallet addresses for the current distribution? Are the tokens sittings in a vault, or are they in the possession of the ens team?
1 Like
Hello,
I am not familiar with the effort/project, so I canāt give you a precise update, but Corey is off for January, as soon as he gets back he will be giving an update.
Thanks
1 Like
An activity that was originally not complicated, an activity that was supposed to benefit everyone, was finally delayed again and again, which made everyone lose confidence in the project team. Why is this? The project team did not realize this problem? With such efficiency and such communication, can this project succeed? I think most people already have the answer in mind.
1 Like